Although the style of writing is less conversational than others, Nichols' insight into the world of documentary is very interesting. Prior to this class (and this reading in particular), I wasn't aware of the nomenclature and sub-classes that exist within the field, much less what separates each category.
I really appreciated his explanation of "reflexivity" as a way to understand documentaries.
That said, I feel that the language was an unnecessary barrier when trying to explain an already complex genre. Some of the words even seemed made-up (talismanic).
Regardless, it provided new terms to help dissect what we've seen in class, and distinguish the real from the fake. Even if his vocabulary falls in the gray.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment